West London Pipeline and Storage Ltd & Anor v Total UK Ltd & Ors

West London Pipeline and Storage Ltd & Anor v Total UK Ltd & Ors

The court has no jurisdiction under CPR Part 18 or CPR Part 31 to order disclosure of TAV's insurance arrangements because such information is not relevant to any matter in dispute in the proceedings, nor does it support or adversely affect any party's case. Established law and practice confirm that insurance details are confidential and not subject to disclosure except under statutory exceptions.

Parties
Claimant: West London Pipeline and Storage Ltd; Claimant: United Kingdom Oil Pipelines Ltd; Defendant/applicant: Total UK Ltd; Defendant/applicant: Total Downstream UK PLC; Defendant/applicant: Hertfordshire Oil Storage Ltd; Third Party/respondent: TAV Engineering Ltd; Fourth Party: Motherwell Control Systems 2003 Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 June 2008
Procedural Posture
Commercial Application / Ruling on Application for Disclosure of Insurance Arrangements
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Disclosure of Insurance Policies, Civil Liability (contribution) Act 1978, Case Management, Relevance of Insurance to Litigation, CPR Part 18, CPR Part 31

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

West London Pipeline and Storage Ltd

Claimant

United Kingdom Oil Pipelines Ltd

Claimant

Total UK Ltd

Defendant/applicant

Total Downstream UK PLC

Defendant/applicant

Hertfordshire Oil Storage Ltd

Defendant/applicant

TAV Engineering Ltd

Third Party/respondent

Motherwell Control Systems 2003 Ltd

Fourth Party

Procedural Posture

Commercial Application / Ruling on Application for Disclosure of Insurance Arrangements

  1. 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to order disclosure of a party's insurance arrangements under CPR Part 18 or CPR Part 31
  2. 2 Whether insurance arrangements are relevant to issues of apportionment or case management in contribution proceedings

Ratio Decidendi

The court has no jurisdiction under CPR Part 18 or CPR Part 31 to order disclosure of TAV's insurance arrangements because such information is not relevant to any matter in dispute in the proceedings, nor does it support or adversely affect any party's case. Established law and practice confirm that insurance details are confidential and not subject to disclosure except under statutory exceptions.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • No order for disclosure of insurance arrangements
  • No jurisdiction to require disclosure under CPR Part 18 or CPR Part 31