K & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2016] EWCA Civ 1149 (23 November 2016)

K & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2016] EWCA Civ 1149 (23 November 2016)

The resolution of the claimants' public law claims constitutes a determination of civil rights under Article 6 ECHR, requiring further disclosure for a fair hearing. Article 6 applies in principle, but Articles 2, 3, and 8 ECHR do not apply as the claimants were not within UK jurisdiction when alleged breaches occurred.

Citation
[2016] EWCA Civ 1149
Parties
Appellants: The Queen on the Application of K & Ors; Respondents: The Secretary of State for Defence & Anr; Special Advocates: Special Advocates: Mr Kieron Beal QC & Mr Zubair Ahmad
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 November 2016
Procedural Posture
Procedural Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court, Administrative Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed in relation to Article 6 ECHR; case remitted for further directions.
Legal Topics
Disclosure of Sensitive Material, Article 6 ECHR (right to Fair Hearing), Jurisdiction Under ECHR, Closed Material Procedures, Civil Rights Determination

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Queen on the Application of K & Ors

Appellants

The Secretary of State for Defence & Anr

Respondents

Special Advocates: Mr Kieron Beal QC & Mr Zubair Ahmad

Special Advocates

Procedural Posture

Procedural Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court, Administrative Court

  1. 1 Whether public law claims constitute determination of civil rights under Article 6 ECHR
  2. 2 Whether further disclosure is required for a fair hearing
  3. 3 Whether Articles 2, 3, and 8 ECHR apply to claimants outside UK jurisdiction

Ratio Decidendi

The resolution of the claimants' public law claims constitutes a determination of civil rights under Article 6 ECHR, requiring further disclosure for a fair hearing. Article 6 applies in principle, but Articles 2, 3, and 8 ECHR do not apply as the claimants were not within UK jurisdiction when alleged breaches occurred.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in relation to Article 6 ECHR; case remitted for further directions.

Orders

  • Proceedings remitted to Divisional Court for directions hearing on expedited basis.
  • Respondents to pay 60% of Appellants' reasonable costs of appeal, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.