K & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2016] EWCA Civ 1149 (23 November 2016)
The resolution of the claimants' public law claims constitutes a determination of civil rights under Article 6 ECHR, requiring further disclosure for a fair hearing. Article 6 applies in principle, but Articles 2, 3, and 8 ECHR do not apply as the claimants were not within UK jurisdiction when alleged breaches occurred.
- Citation
- [2016] EWCA Civ 1149
- Parties
- Appellants: The Queen on the Application of K & Ors; Respondents: The Secretary of State for Defence & Anr; Special Advocates: Special Advocates: Mr Kieron Beal QC & Mr Zubair Ahmad
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Procedural Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court, Administrative Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in relation to Article 6 ECHR; case remitted for further directions.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Sensitive Material, Article 6 ECHR (right to Fair Hearing), Jurisdiction Under ECHR, Closed Material Procedures, Civil Rights Determination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen on the Application of K & Ors
Appellants
The Secretary of State for Defence & Anr
Respondents
Special Advocates: Mr Kieron Beal QC & Mr Zubair Ahmad
Special Advocates
Procedural Posture
Procedural Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court, Administrative Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether public law claims constitute determination of civil rights under Article 6 ECHR
- 2 Whether further disclosure is required for a fair hearing
- 3 Whether Articles 2, 3, and 8 ECHR apply to claimants outside UK jurisdiction
Ratio Decidendi
The resolution of the claimants' public law claims constitutes a determination of civil rights under Article 6 ECHR, requiring further disclosure for a fair hearing. Article 6 applies in principle, but Articles 2, 3, and 8 ECHR do not apply as the claimants were not within UK jurisdiction when alleged breaches occurred.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in relation to Article 6 ECHR; case remitted for further directions.
Orders
- Proceedings remitted to Divisional Court for directions hearing on expedited basis.
- Respondents to pay 60% of Appellants' reasonable costs of appeal, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment