Senna v Henderson & Ors

Senna v Henderson & Ors

All applications by the claimant are totally without merit; there is no legal or factual basis for disqualification of Brodies LLP, no grounds for stay, communications must be via solicitors, service/jurisdiction declarations are unnecessary, committal applications must comply with prior orders, no basis for indemnity costs, and no legal basis for special measures or asset examination orders against the Third Defendant.

Parties
Claimant: Raj Pal Senna; First Defendant: Connor William Henderson; Second Defendant: CCHG Ltd T/A VPZ; Third Defendant: Mariangeles Ariadna Nowacki; Fourth Defendant: Brodies LLP; Fifth Defendant: Callum Robert Henderson
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 December 2020
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Applications Ruling
Outcome
All applications by the claimant dismissed as totally without merit
Legal Topics
Disqualification of Legal Representatives, Stay of Proceedings, Service and Jurisdiction, Committal Applications, Indemnity Costs, Remote Hearings, Case Management, Harassment, Breach of Contract, Fraud
Civil Procedure Company Law Contract Law Harassment Disqualification of Legal Representatives Stay of Proceedings Service and Jurisdiction Committal Applications +5 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Raj Pal Senna

Claimant

Connor William Henderson

First Defendant

CCHG Ltd T/A VPZ

Second Defendant

Mariangeles Ariadna Nowacki

Third Defendant

Brodies LLP

Fourth Defendant

Callum Robert Henderson

Fifth Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory Applications Ruling

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether Brodies LLP should be disqualified from acting for certain defendants
  2. 2 Whether proceedings should be stayed pending criminal/contempt proceedings
  3. 3 Whether claimant may communicate directly with represented defendants

Ratio Decidendi

All applications by the claimant are totally without merit; there is no legal or factual basis for disqualification of Brodies LLP, no grounds for stay, communications must be via solicitors, service/jurisdiction declarations are unnecessary, committal applications must comply with prior orders, no basis for indemnity costs, and no legal basis for special measures or asset examination orders against the Third Defendant.

Court Disposition

All applications by the claimant dismissed as totally without merit

Orders

  • Application for disqualification of Brodies LLP dismissed
  • Application for stay of proceedings dismissed