Al-Bassam v Al-Bassam
The Court of Appeal held that interim relief (disclosure, restraint on assets) was properly refused as the claimant’s entitlement was not yet established and enforcement would be impractical. The anti-suit injunction was set aside in its perpetual form but replaced with an interim restraint pending trial of threshold issues (due execution and domicile), as a limited restraint was necessary to protect the English proceedings. The claimant was allowed to amend her particulars of claim to allege constructive trusteeship, as refusal conflated amendment with interim relief. Jurisdictional objections to the amendment were rejected as the defendant had submitted to the English court.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Lesley June Al-Bassam; Defendant/respondent: Abdullah Saleh Al-Bassam
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 July 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeals From High Court Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; interim anti-suit injunction imposed; permission to amend particulars of claim granted; interim relief otherwise refused.
- Legal Topics
- Domicile, Recognition of Foreign Judgments, Validity of Wills, Anti Suit Injunctions, Constructive Trusts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lesley June Al-Bassam
Claimant/appellant
Abdullah Saleh Al-Bassam
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeals From High Court Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English court should grant interim relief (disclosure, restraint on dealing with assets) pending trial of threshold issues of due execution and domicile
- 2 Whether the English court should grant an anti-suit injunction restraining proceedings in Saudi Arabia
- 3 Whether the claimant should be allowed to amend her particulars of claim to allege constructive trusteeship
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal held that interim relief (disclosure, restraint on assets) was properly refused as the claimant’s entitlement was not yet established and enforcement would be impractical. The anti-suit injunction was set aside in its perpetual form but replaced with an interim restraint pending trial of threshold issues (due execution and domicile), as a limited restraint was necessary to protect the English proceedings. The claimant was allowed to amend her particulars of claim to allege constructive trusteeship, as refusal conflated amendment with interim relief. Jurisdictional objections to the amendment were rejected as the defendant had submitted to the English court.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; interim anti-suit injunction imposed; permission to amend particulars of claim granted; interim relief otherwise refused.
Orders
- Interim anti-suit injunction restraining continuation of Saudi proceedings until determination of threshold issues or further order
- Permission to amend particulars of claim to allege constructive trusteeship
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment