Mark v Mark [2002] EWCA Civ 1837 (27 November 2002)
Resolution of the pure point of law regarding domicile of choice for a spouse with unlawful residence is necessary for jurisdiction in divorce proceedings; proportionality of costs must be considered.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Civ 1837
- Parties
- Applicant/respondent: David Alchenu Bonaventure Mark; Petitioner/respondent: Vitoria Preye Mark
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From High Court (family Division) / Permission to Appeal and Costs Order Challenged
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted, subject to mediation requirement.
- Legal Topics
- Domicile of Choice, Jurisdiction for Divorce, Costs in Family Proceedings, Mediation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Alchenu Bonaventure Mark
Applicant/respondent
Vitoria Preye Mark
Petitioner/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From High Court (family Division) / Permission to Appeal and Costs Order Challenged
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a spouse with unlawful residence in the UK may acquire a domicile of choice in England and Wales
- 2 Jurisdictional basis for dissolution of marriage
- 3 Proportionality of legal costs
Ratio Decidendi
Resolution of the pure point of law regarding domicile of choice for a spouse with unlawful residence is necessary for jurisdiction in divorce proceedings; proportionality of costs must be considered.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted, subject to mediation requirement.
Orders
- No further step in appeal until both parties respond fully to court's invitation to mediate under Court of Appeal ADR scheme.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment