A v Secretary of State for the Home Department
The applicant established arguable grounds with a real prospect of success on both points of construction regarding the meaning of 'guardian' and the interpretation of Article 5.2 of the Dublin II Regulation. Permission to appeal is granted for substantive consideration of these issues.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: A; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted; appeal allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Dublin II Regulation, Judicial Review, Article 8 ECHR, Asylum Procedure, Interpretation of 'guardian'
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A
Claimant/appellant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the term 'guardian' in Article 6 of the Dublin II Regulation should be narrowly or broadly construed
- 2 Whether Article 5.2 of the Dublin II Regulation requires consideration of the situation as it truly obtained when the asylum seeker first lodged an application
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant established arguable grounds with a real prospect of success on both points of construction regarding the meaning of 'guardian' and the interpretation of Article 5.2 of the Dublin II Regulation. Permission to appeal is granted for substantive consideration of these issues.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted; appeal allowed.
Orders
- Substantive appeal to proceed in the Court of Appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment