Naylors Timber Recovery Ltd v Jones (t/a Ark Pallets) [2001] EWCA Civ 1809 (16 November 2001)
The agreement of 28 February 1994 was a binding compromise of all claims between the parties, not procured by duress or undue influence, and supported by consideration; therefore, the applicant's counterclaim was properly dismissed and there is no prospect of success on appeal.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1809
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Naylors Timber Recovery Limited; Defendant/applicant: Reginald Jones trading as Ark Pallets
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Duress, Undue Influence, Settlement of Accounts, Consideration, Compromise Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Naylors Timber Recovery Limited
Claimant/respondent
Reginald Jones trading as Ark Pallets
Defendant/applicant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the agreement of 28 February 1994 was procured by duress or undue influence
- 2 Whether the agreement constituted a binding compromise of all claims between the parties
- 3 Whether there was consideration to support the agreement
Ratio Decidendi
The agreement of 28 February 1994 was a binding compromise of all claims between the parties, not procured by duress or undue influence, and supported by consideration; therefore, the applicant's counterclaim was properly dismissed and there is no prospect of success on appeal.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment