Darnley v Croydon Health Services NHS Trust
Reception staff do not owe a tortious duty to provide accurate information about waiting times; their function is clerical and the provision of such information is a courtesy, not a legal obligation. It is not fair, just and reasonable to impose such a duty. The claimant's injury was not caused by breach of duty, as he chose to leave the hospital.
- Parties
- Appellant / Claimant: Michael Mark Junior Darnley; Respondent / Defendant: Croydon Health Services NHS Trust
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Duty of Care, Negligent Misstatement, Personal Injury, Hospital Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Mark Junior Darnley
Appellant / Claimant
Croydon Health Services NHS Trust
Respondent / Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether hospital reception staff owe a tortious duty to provide accurate information about waiting times
- 2 Whether failure to triage within 15 minutes constituted breach of duty
- 3 Whether provision of inaccurate information by receptionist caused claimant's injury
Ratio Decidendi
Reception staff do not owe a tortious duty to provide accurate information about waiting times; their function is clerical and the provision of such information is a courtesy, not a legal obligation. It is not fair, just and reasonable to impose such a duty. The claimant's injury was not caused by breach of duty, as he chose to leave the hospital.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment