Darby v Richmond on Thames London Borough Council
The statutory scheme governing housing allocation does not create a common law duty of care owed by the council to the applicant; comprehensive alternative remedies exist; case law precludes such a duty; the claim discloses no reasonable grounds and was properly struck out.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Lillian Darby (Administratrix of the estate of Lee Mark Rabbetts, deceased); Defendant/respondent: Richmond on Thames London Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal; Appeal If Permission Granted
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Duty of Care, Public Authority Liability, Housing Allocation, Statutory Duty, Judicial Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lillian Darby (Administratrix of the estate of Lee Mark Rabbetts, deceased)
Claimant/appellant
Richmond on Thames London Borough Council
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal; Appeal If Permission Granted
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a local housing authority owes a common law duty of care to an applicant in allocating housing under statutory functions
- 2 Whether failure to allocate sufficient medical points and re-house constitutes actionable negligence
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory scheme governing housing allocation does not create a common law duty of care owed by the council to the applicant; comprehensive alternative remedies exist; case law precludes such a duty; the claim discloses no reasonable grounds and was properly struck out.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal refused
- No order as to appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment