Reynolds v Abel Estate Agent Ltd & Ors [2025] EWCA Civ 1357 (27 October 2025)
Failure to comply with section 18A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 by not invoking the early conciliation process before presenting a claim deprives the Employment Tribunal of jurisdiction to entertain the detriment claim. The claim must be dismissed or struck out for want of jurisdiction, and case management powers cannot cure substantive statutory non-compliance.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Civ 1357
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Elizabeth Reynolds; Respondent/appellant: Abel Estate Agent Ltd; Respondent/appellant: Abel Living Ltd; Respondent/appellant: Abel of Hertford Ltd; Respondent/appellant: Ami Hayward; Respondent/appellant: Charles Court; Respondent/appellant: Lucinda Casey
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; cross-appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Early Conciliation, Jurisdiction, Whistleblowing, Unfair Dismissal, Detriment, Case Management, Amendment of Claim
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Elizabeth Reynolds
Claimant/respondent
Abel Estate Agent Ltd
Respondent/appellant
Abel Living Ltd
Respondent/appellant
Abel of Hertford Ltd
Respondent/appellant
Ami Hayward
Respondent/appellant
Charles Court
Respondent/appellant
Lucinda Casey
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Does failure to comply with section 18A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 deprive the Employment Tribunal of jurisdiction to hear detriment claims under section 48 of the Employment Rights Act 1996?
- 2 Can a claim be amended or reinstated after dismissal for lack of jurisdiction due to early conciliation non-compliance?
Ratio Decidendi
Failure to comply with section 18A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996 by not invoking the early conciliation process before presenting a claim deprives the Employment Tribunal of jurisdiction to entertain the detriment claim. The claim must be dismissed or struck out for want of jurisdiction, and case management powers cannot cure substantive statutory non-compliance.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; cross-appeal dismissed
Orders
- The detriment claim is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under rule 27 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure.
- Permission to amend the claim form is not restored.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment