Gore v Naheed & Anor [2017] EWCA Civ 369 (24 May 2017)
The right of way granted by the 1921 conveyance includes the right to use the driveway to access and park in the garage, provided such use is ancillary to the occupation and enjoyment of the Granary. The use of the garage for parking by a resident of the Granary is ancillary and within the scope of the grant. The award of general damages was not justified as no such claim was pleaded or advanced at trial. The terms of the injunction and the costs order were appropriate and within the trial judge's discretion.
- Citation
- [2017] EWCA Civ 369
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Graham Gore; Defendant/appellant: Kishwar Naheed; Defendant/appellant: Asim Suhail Ahmed
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Judgment and Costs Order
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part and dismissed in part.
- Legal Topics
- Easements, Right of Way, Ancillary Use, Damages, Costs, Injunctions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Graham Gore
Claimant/respondent
Kishwar Naheed
Defendant/appellant
Asim Suhail Ahmed
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Trial Judgment and Costs Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the right of way granted by a 1921 conveyance includes the right to use the driveway to access and park in a garage built on land acquired by the dominant owner after the grant;
- 2 Whether the use of the driveway for parking in the garage is ancillary to the use and enjoyment of the dominant tenement;
- 3 Whether the injunction terms and damages awarded by the trial judge were appropriate;
Ratio Decidendi
The right of way granted by the 1921 conveyance includes the right to use the driveway to access and park in the garage, provided such use is ancillary to the occupation and enjoyment of the Granary. The use of the garage for parking by a resident of the Granary is ancillary and within the scope of the grant. The award of general damages was not justified as no such claim was pleaded or advanced at trial. The terms of the injunction and the costs order were appropriate and within the trial judge's discretion.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part and dismissed in part.
Orders
- Defendants' appeal against the award of general damages allowed; award of £2,500 general damages set aside.
- Appeal otherwise dismissed; injunction and costs orders upheld, subject to clarification that the right to access the garage is limited to use in connection with the occupation of the Granary.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment