Annetts v Adeleye [2018] EWCA Civ 555 (22 March 2018)
The right of way over the Strip was not abandoned by the 1988 Transfer and fencing covenant, as the covenant did not demonstrate a clear intention to extinguish the right of way; even if the covenant precluded a gate, it did not amount to abandonment. Upon reunification of the Strip and Summerhill, the right of way revives for the benefit of the unified property.
- Citation
- [2018] EWCA Civ 555
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Clare Elizabeth Annetts; Defendant/appellant: Nureni Adetunji Adeleye
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Easements, Abandonment of Rights of Way, Interpretation of Covenants, Land Transfers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Clare Elizabeth Annetts
Claimant/respondent
Nureni Adetunji Adeleye
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the right of way over the Strip was abandoned by the 1988 Transfer and fencing covenant
- 2 Whether abandonment, if any, was partial or total
- 3 Whether reunification of the Strip and Summerhill revives the right of way
Ratio Decidendi
The right of way over the Strip was not abandoned by the 1988 Transfer and fencing covenant, as the covenant did not demonstrate a clear intention to extinguish the right of way; even if the covenant precluded a gate, it did not amount to abandonment. Upon reunification of the Strip and Summerhill, the right of way revives for the benefit of the unified property.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal is allowed; the right of way over the Strip is not abandoned and revives upon reunification of the properties.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment