Green v Lord Somerleyton & Ors
The Trustees are entitled to an easement of drainage over Priory Marshes for water, including that emanating from Fritton Lake, by implied reservation in the 1921 Conveyance and/or by prescription. No liability in nuisance arises as the Trustees did not breach any Leakey duty; the drainage arrangements were reasonable, and the exempting proviso in the 1958 Drainage Deed precludes liability for the 1993 flood. The appeal is dismissed and the Trustees' cross-appeal is allowed.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: John Green; Defendant/respondent: The Right Honourable Lord Somerleyton; Defendant/respondent: Sir Nicholas Bacon; Defendant/respondent: Mr Thomas Davies
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Easements, Nuisance, Drainage Rights, Implied Easements, Prescriptive Easements, Liability for Natural Hazards
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Green
Claimant/appellant
The Right Honourable Lord Somerleyton
Defendant/respondent
Sir Nicholas Bacon
Defendant/respondent
Mr Thomas Davies
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Trustees have an easement of drainage over Priory Marshes for water emanating from Fritton Lake and Scale Marshes
- 2 Whether the Trustees are liable in nuisance for flooding of Priory Marshes
- 3 Whether a Leakey duty arises in relation to naturally flowing water
Ratio Decidendi
The Trustees are entitled to an easement of drainage over Priory Marshes for water, including that emanating from Fritton Lake, by implied reservation in the 1921 Conveyance and/or by prescription. No liability in nuisance arises as the Trustees did not breach any Leakey duty; the drainage arrangements were reasonable, and the exempting proviso in the 1958 Drainage Deed precludes liability for the 1993 flood. The appeal is dismissed and the Trustees' cross-appeal is allowed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed and the cross-appeal is allowed.
- The appellant to pay the respondents’ costs of the appeal and cross-appeal, subject to detailed assessment if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment