Orme v Lyons
The Adjudicator was entitled to find that the respondents' use of the track, though less frequent than their predecessors, was sufficient in the circumstances to alert a reasonable servient owner to the assertion of a continuous right, especially given the physical nature of the track and its history of use. The appeal is dismissed as the Adjudicator's application of the law to the facts was justified.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Orme; Defendant/appellant: Lyons
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Decision of Deputy Adjudicator to HM Land Registry
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Easements, Lost Modern Grant, Prescriptive Rights, Land Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Orme
Claimant/respondent
Lyons
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Decision of Deputy Adjudicator to HM Land Registry
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents have the benefit of a vehicular right of way over the track under the doctrine of lost modern grant
- 2 Whether the use of the track by the respondents was of sufficient character, degree, and frequency to establish a prescriptive right
Ratio Decidendi
The Adjudicator was entitled to find that the respondents' use of the track, though less frequent than their predecessors, was sufficient in the circumstances to alert a reasonable servient owner to the assertion of a continuous right, especially given the physical nature of the track and its history of use. The appeal is dismissed as the Adjudicator's application of the law to the facts was justified.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; the decision of the Adjudicator stands
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment