On Tower UK Ltd v JH & FW Green Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 1858 (07 December 2021)
The Tribunal did not err in law by granting unrestricted upgrading and sharing rights to the operator. Paragraph 17 of the Code sets a minimum, not a ceiling, and the Tribunal has discretion to grant more extensive rights if justified. The requirement to have regard to the existing agreement (paragraph 34(12)) does not create a presumption against change, especially where the existing terms are inconsistent with the Code's objectives. The Tribunal considered all relevant circumstances and the operator's business needs, and its decision stands.
- Citation
- [2020] UKUT 348
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: On Tower UK Limited; Respondent/appellant: J. H. & F. W. Green Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Upper Tribunal (lands Chamber) / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Electronic Communications Code, Lease Renewal, Upgrading and Sharing Rights, Statutory Interpretation, Landlord and Tenant Act 1954
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
On Tower UK Limited
Claimant/respondent
J. H. & F. W. Green Limited
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Upper Tribunal (lands Chamber) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in granting unrestricted upgrading and sharing rights to the operator under a new agreement imposed pursuant to the Electronic Communications Code.
- 2 The correct approach to the significance of paragraph 34(12) (regard to existing agreement) and paragraph 17 (upgrading/sharing rights) of the Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal did not err in law by granting unrestricted upgrading and sharing rights to the operator. Paragraph 17 of the Code sets a minimum, not a ceiling, and the Tribunal has discretion to grant more extensive rights if justified. The requirement to have regard to the existing agreement (paragraph 34(12)) does not create a presumption against change, especially where the existing terms are inconsistent with the Code's objectives. The Tribunal considered all relevant circumstances and the operator's business needs, and its decision stands.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The decision of the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) is affirmed.
- On Tower UK Limited is entitled to unrestricted upgrading and sharing rights under the new agreement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment