World Uyghur Congress (2) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2023] EWHC 912 (Admin) (21 April 2023)
No further action is warranted as the breach was the result of an individual error, was promptly contained, and was not due to systemic failure; the responsible individual has acknowledged the mistake and apologised, and the Government Legal Department acted appropriately throughout.
- Citation
- [2023] EWHC 912 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: World Uyghur Congress; Defendant 1: Secretary of State for the Home Department; Defendant 2: Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue & Customs Service; Defendant 3: National Crime Agency
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Post Judgment, Consideration of Embargo Breach
- Outcome
- No further action taken; breach recorded only.
- Legal Topics
- Embargoed Judgments, Confidentiality, Contempt Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
World Uyghur Congress
Claimant
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Defendant 1
Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue & Customs Service
Defendant 2
National Crime Agency
Defendant 3
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Post Judgment, Consideration of Embargo Breach
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a breach of the embargo on a draft judgment
- 2 Whether further action should be taken in respect of the breach
Ratio Decidendi
No further action is warranted as the breach was the result of an individual error, was promptly contained, and was not due to systemic failure; the responsible individual has acknowledged the mistake and apologised, and the Government Legal Department acted appropriately throughout.
Court Disposition
No further action taken; breach recorded only.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment