The Counsel General for Wales, R (On the Application Of) v The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy [2022] EWCA Civ 181 (16 February 2022)
It is the personal responsibility of counsel and solicitors to ensure strict compliance with embargoes on draft judgments; breaches, even if inadvertent, are unacceptable and may result in contempt proceedings in future. Draft judgments and their substance must not be disclosed or acted upon outside the permitted purposes before hand-down.
- Citation
- [2022] EWCA Civ 181
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: The Queen on the application of The Counsel General for Wales; Respondent/defendant: The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy; Interested Party: The Lord Advocate; Interested Party: The Attorney General for Northern Ireland
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review (administrative Law) / Appeal From High Court (divisional Court) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- No contempt proceedings initiated; warning issued
- Legal Topics
- Embargo on Draft Judgments, Confidentiality of Court Documents, Breach of Court Orders, Personal Responsibility of Legal Representatives
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Queen on the application of The Counsel General for Wales
Appellant/claimant
The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Respondent/defendant
The Lord Advocate
Interested Party
The Attorney General for Northern Ireland
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review (administrative Law) / Appeal From High Court (divisional Court) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the embargo on the draft judgment was breached
- 2 What are the obligations of legal representatives regarding embargoed judgments
- 3 What are the appropriate consequences for breach of embargo
Ratio Decidendi
It is the personal responsibility of counsel and solicitors to ensure strict compliance with embargoes on draft judgments; breaches, even if inadvertent, are unacceptable and may result in contempt proceedings in future. Draft judgments and their substance must not be disclosed or acted upon outside the permitted purposes before hand-down.
Court Disposition
No contempt proceedings initiated; warning issued
Orders
- No further action taken against the barristers or Chambers
- Clear warning that future breaches will likely result in contempt proceedings
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment