Phillips v Syndicate 992 Gunner & Ors [2003] EWHC 1084 (QB) (14 May 2003)
The insurer is liable to indemnify the insured in full for the liability arising from the material contribution to mesothelioma during its period of cover, as the 'rateable proportion' clause does not apply to successive policies and there is no basis in custom, practice, or business efficacy to imply a term limiting liability to a proportionate share.
- Citation
- [2003] EWHC 1084
- Parties
- Claimant: Sylvia Phillips (Widow & Executrix of the Estate of Arthur Phillips, Deceased); Defendants: Syndicate 992 Gunner and Others
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Insurance Indemnity Claim / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Claimant
- Legal Topics
- Employers' Liability, Indemnity Under Insurance Contracts, Mesothelioma Claims, Third Parties (rights Against Insurers) Act 1930, Interpretation of Insurance Policy Terms
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sylvia Phillips (Widow & Executrix of the Estate of Arthur Phillips, Deceased)
Claimant
Syndicate 992 Gunner and Others
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil Insurance Indemnity Claim / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the insurer is liable for the full judgment sum or only a proportionate part corresponding to its period of cover under an employer's liability policy for mesothelioma contracted due to asbestos exposure.
- 2 Whether a 'rateable proportion' clause in the policy applies to successive, rather than concurrent, insurance policies.
- 3 Whether custom, practice, or business efficacy requires implication of a term limiting liability to a proportionate share.
Ratio Decidendi
The insurer is liable to indemnify the insured in full for the liability arising from the material contribution to mesothelioma during its period of cover, as the 'rateable proportion' clause does not apply to successive policies and there is no basis in custom, practice, or business efficacy to imply a term limiting liability to a proportionate share.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Claimant
Orders
- Defendants to pay the outstanding balance of £56,375 plus interest under the judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment