Burgess v Plymouth City Council [2005] EWCA Civ 1659 (30 December 2005)
The Council breached its statutory duty by failing to ensure the lunch box container was safely stowed, as required by Regulation 12(3), and it was reasonably practicable to do so. Mrs Burgess was contributorily negligent for failing to notice an obvious hazard, justifying a 50% reduction in damages.
- Citation
- [2005] EWCA Civ 1659
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Rita Burgess; Defendant/appellant: Plymouth City Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 December 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Employer's Liability, Workplace Safety, Contributory Negligence, Statutory Duty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rita Burgess
Claimant/respondent
Plymouth City Council
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Council breached its statutory duty under Regulation 12(3) of the Workplace (Health Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992
- 2 Whether Mrs Burgess was contributorily negligent and to what extent
Ratio Decidendi
The Council breached its statutory duty by failing to ensure the lunch box container was safely stowed, as required by Regulation 12(3), and it was reasonably practicable to do so. Mrs Burgess was contributorily negligent for failing to notice an obvious hazard, justifying a 50% reduction in damages.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appellant to pay the Respondent's costs
- Cost of the appeal summarily assessed at £8,800 inclusive of VAT
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment