Mark Storey v British Telecommunications Plc
The absence of expert engineering evidence is not fatal to Mr Storey's claim for acoustic shock, particularly where the defendant's loss or destruction of relevant evidence made it impossible for the claimant to obtain such evidence. The claim should proceed to trial for factual determination.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Mark Storey; Defendant/respondent: British Telecommunications PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment/strike Out
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Employer's Duty of Care, Acoustic Shock, Summary Judgment, Expert Evidence, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Storey
Claimant/appellant
British Telecommunications PLC
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment/strike Out
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether absence of expert engineering evidence is fatal to a claim for acoustic shock
- 2 Whether the claim should be struck out or summary judgment entered due to lack of such evidence
- 3 Whether the employer's loss or destruction of relevant evidence affects the claimant's ability to prove the case
Ratio Decidendi
The absence of expert engineering evidence is not fatal to Mr Storey's claim for acoustic shock, particularly where the defendant's loss or destruction of relevant evidence made it impossible for the claimant to obtain such evidence. The claim should proceed to trial for factual determination.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order for summary judgment set aside
- Order striking out the claim set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment