Mason & Anor v East Potential Ltd

Mason & Anor v East Potential Ltd

East Potential Limited did not have sufficient control over the ladder or the way it was used to be liable under the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998. The Workplace Regulations did not apply as the only activity in the server room was construction work. Therefore, East is not liable to contribute to Satelcom's liability to Mr Mason.

Parties
Claimant: Adam Mason; Defendant/respondent: Satelcom Limited; Part 20 Defendant/appellant: East Potential Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 May 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed; cross-appeal dismissed; judgment for East against Satelcom on the contribution claim.
Legal Topics
Employer's Liability, Statutory Duty, Negligence, Contribution Claims, Interpretation of Health and Safety Regulations
Employment Law Health and Safety Law Tort Law Employer's Liability Statutory Duty Negligence Contribution Claims Interpretation of Health and Safety Regulations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Adam Mason

Claimant

Satelcom Limited

Defendant/respondent

East Potential Limited

Part 20 Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether East Potential Limited had sufficient control of the ladder to be liable under the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998
  2. 2 Whether the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 applied to the facts
  3. 3 Proper apportionment of liability for the accident

Ratio Decidendi

East Potential Limited did not have sufficient control over the ladder or the way it was used to be liable under the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998. The Workplace Regulations did not apply as the only activity in the server room was construction work. Therefore, East is not liable to contribute to Satelcom's liability to Mr Mason.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; cross-appeal dismissed; judgment for East against Satelcom on the contribution claim.

Orders

  • East Potential Limited not liable to contribute to Satelcom's liability to Mr Mason.
  • No order for prospective costs as to assessment of damages.