Khatri v Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA
The March 2008 contract conferred a right to a performance-related bonus calculated by the specified formula for 2008. There was no unequivocal acceptance by the claimant of the July 2008 variation, and the facts did not require a trial. Summary judgment should be granted for the claimant.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Saleem Khatri; Defendant/respondent: Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Refusal of Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; summary judgment granted to claimant
- Legal Topics
- Employment Contract Variation, Bonus Entitlement, Summary Judgment, Implied Acceptance of Contract Terms
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Saleem Khatri
Claimant/appellant
Cooperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen-Boerenleenbank BA
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Refusal of Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was entitled to a performance-related bonus under the March 2008 contract
- 2 Whether the contract was validly varied by the July 2008 correspondence and conduct
- 3 Whether summary judgment was appropriate given the facts
Ratio Decidendi
The March 2008 contract conferred a right to a performance-related bonus calculated by the specified formula for 2008. There was no unequivocal acceptance by the claimant of the July 2008 variation, and the facts did not require a trial. Summary judgment should be granted for the claimant.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; summary judgment granted to claimant
Orders
- Summary judgment for the claimant for the bonus sum claimed under the contract
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment