HSBC Bank Plc v Brophy
The application form, when signed by Mr. Brophy and countersigned by the Bank, constituted an executed agreement containing the prescribed term regarding the credit limit, as required by the Act and regulations. The agreement was therefore enforceable.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: HSBC Bank Plc; Defendant/appellant: Patrick Brophy
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Enforceability of Credit Agreements, Consumer Credit Act 1974, Prescribed Terms in Credit Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HSBC Bank Plc
Claimant/respondent
Patrick Brophy
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the credit card agreement satisfied the requirements of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and associated regulations
- 2 Whether the agreement contained the prescribed terms regarding credit limit as required by law
Ratio Decidendi
The application form, when signed by Mr. Brophy and countersigned by the Bank, constituted an executed agreement containing the prescribed term regarding the credit limit, as required by the Act and regulations. The agreement was therefore enforceable.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; judgment for HSBC Bank Plc stands
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment