N v N [1999] EWHC Fam 838 (01 July 1999)
The English court does not have jurisdiction to specifically enforce an ante-nuptial agreement or a court order compelling a spouse to obtain a Get, nor can it grant the relief sought by the wife; such agreements are not specifically enforceable as a matter of public policy, and the court's powers are limited to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1999] EWHC Fam 838
- Parties
- Wife: N.; Husband: N.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 July 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law (divorce/ancillary Relief/children) / Post Divorce, Application for Specific Relief (summons)
- Outcome
- Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
- Legal Topics
- Enforceability of Ante Nuptial Agreements, Jurisdiction Over Religious Divorce (get), Children Act Proceedings, Specific Performance, Public Policy and Marriage Contracts
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
N.
Wife
N.
Husband
Procedural Posture
Family Law (divorce/ancillary Relief/children) / Post Divorce, Application for Specific Relief (summons)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English court has jurisdiction to compel a spouse to obtain a Get (Jewish religious divorce)
- 2 Whether ante-nuptial agreements or specific clauses therein are specifically enforceable
- 3 Whether a court order or agreement to obtain a Get is enforceable by injunction or other means
Ratio Decidendi
The English court does not have jurisdiction to specifically enforce an ante-nuptial agreement or a court order compelling a spouse to obtain a Get, nor can it grant the relief sought by the wife; such agreements are not specifically enforceable as a matter of public policy, and the court's powers are limited to those conferred by statute.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment