Roundshield Partners LLP v Ciudad Real International Airport SL & Ors [2019] EWHC 2733 (QB) (17 October 2019)
The court held that the binding clause in the Term Sheet required Fund Expenses to be agreed in advance by the Sponsor (the defendants), acting reasonably. The claimant failed to prove that such advance agreement was obtained for the majority of the expenses claimed. The amounts claimed were not all reasonable or properly approved. Accordingly, most of the claim failed. There was no basis for personal liability of Mr Arribas in tort, and Roundshield's entitlement to sue was not established for invoices addressed to other entities.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 2733 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Roundshield Partners LLP; First Defendant: Ciudad Real International Airport SL; Second Defendant: Remotor Reparaciones y Motores SL; Third Defendant: Punta Ibiza SL; Fourth Defendant: Rafael Gomez Arribas
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Contract Claim / Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim largely dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Enforceability of Term Sheet, Recovery of Expenses, Requirement for Prior Approval of Expenses, Reasonableness of Costs, Personal Liability for Inducing Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Roundshield Partners LLP
Claimant
Ciudad Real International Airport SL
First Defendant
Remotor Reparaciones y Motores SL
Second Defendant
Punta Ibiza SL
Third Defendant
Rafael Gomez Arribas
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Contract Claim / Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants are liable to reimburse the claimant for Fund Expenses under the binding clause of the Term Sheet
- 2 Whether prior approval by the Sponsor was required for Fund Expenses
- 3 Whether the amounts claimed are reasonable and recoverable
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the binding clause in the Term Sheet required Fund Expenses to be agreed in advance by the Sponsor (the defendants), acting reasonably. The claimant failed to prove that such advance agreement was obtained for the majority of the expenses claimed. The amounts claimed were not all reasonable or properly approved. Accordingly, most of the claim failed. There was no basis for personal liability of Mr Arribas in tort, and Roundshield's entitlement to sue was not established for invoices addressed to other entities.
Court Disposition
Claim largely dismissed
Orders
- Claim for most Fund Expenses dismissed
- No personal liability found against Mr Arribas
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment