Sage v Secretary Of State For Environment, Transport & Regions & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 1100 (28 June 2001)
For the purposes of section 171B(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, the four-year limitation period for enforcement action begins when all operations amounting to 'development' are substantially completed. Internal works and operations excluded from the definition of development by section 55(2)(a) are not required for substantial completion. The inspector erred in law by including such works in his assessment.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 1100
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Alan Frank Sage; First Defendant: Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions; Second Defendant/appellant: Maidstone Borough Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Queen's Bench Division (high Court) / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Enforcement Notice, Substantial Completion, Town and Country Planning Act 1990, Development Definition, Immunity From Enforcement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alan Frank Sage
Claimant/respondent
Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions
First Defendant
Maidstone Borough Council
Second Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Queen's Bench Division (high Court) / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 What constitutes 'substantial completion' of building operations under section 171B(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 for the purposes of immunity from enforcement action?
- 2 Whether internal works and non-development operations must be completed for the four-year limitation period to begin.
Ratio Decidendi
For the purposes of section 171B(1) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, the four-year limitation period for enforcement action begins when all operations amounting to 'development' are substantially completed. Internal works and operations excluded from the definition of development by section 55(2)(a) are not required for substantial completion. The inspector erred in law by including such works in his assessment.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs in favour of the Respondent
- Permission to appeal to the House of Lords refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment