Watson v Perotti [2002] EWCA Civ 1768 (22 November 2002)

Watson v Perotti [2002] EWCA Civ 1768 (22 November 2002)

The application for permission to appeal was refused because the grounds raised by the applicant were either irrelevant, misconceived, or had no prospect of success. The judge's decisions regarding the conduct of the sale and entitlement to documents were correct in law, and no arguable case was made for appeal.

Citation
[2002] EWCA Civ 1768
Parties
Claimant/respondent: Kenneth Corbett Watson; Defendant/applicant: Angelo Perotti
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 November 2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
Application for permission to appeal refused
Legal Topics
Enforcement of Costs Orders, Charging Orders, Sale of Property to Satisfy Judgment, Rights to Documents Under Costs Orders, Legal Representation and Access to Justice
Civil Procedure Property Law Enforcement of Costs Orders Charging Orders Sale of Property to Satisfy Judgment Rights to Documents Under Costs Orders Legal Representation and Access to Justice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kenneth Corbett Watson

Claimant/respondent

Angelo Perotti

Defendant/applicant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the judge erred in refusing to interfere with the conduct of sale of charged properties
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to documents for which he paid copying charges under a costs order
  3. 3 Whether the applicant's rights under the European Convention on Human Rights were infringed by lack of legal assistance

Ratio Decidendi

The application for permission to appeal was refused because the grounds raised by the applicant were either irrelevant, misconceived, or had no prospect of success. The judge's decisions regarding the conduct of the sale and entitlement to documents were correct in law, and no arguable case was made for appeal.

Court Disposition

Application for permission to appeal refused

Orders

  • Application refused