Eliades & Ors v Lewis [2003] EWCA Civ 1758 (08 December 2003)
A foreign judgment that includes both compensatory and multiple damages is unenforceable in the UK only to the extent of the multiple damages element under s.5 of the Protection of Trading Interests Act 1980. The compensatory elements, if severable and quantifiable, remain enforceable. The Act should not be construed to bar enforcement of the entire judgment where only part falls within the statutory prohibition.
- Citation
- [2003] EWCA Civ 1758
- Parties
- Appellant/defendant: Panos Eliades; Appellant/defendant: Panix Promotions Ltd; Appellant/defendant: Panix of the US Inc; Respondent/claimant: Lennox Lewis
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed save as to the RICO multiple damages element; enforcement permitted for compensatory elements only.
- Legal Topics
- Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, Multiple Damages, Protection of Trading Interests Act 1980, RICO Act, Summary Judgment, Severance of Judgment Elements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Panos Eliades
Appellant/defendant
Panix Promotions Ltd
Appellant/defendant
Panix of the US Inc
Appellant/defendant
Lennox Lewis
Respondent/claimant
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Appeal From High Court (queen's Bench Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a foreign judgment containing both compensatory and multiple damages is wholly unenforceable under s.5 of the Protection of Trading Interests Act 1980 or only unenforceable to the extent of the multiple damages element.
- 2 Whether the compensatory elements of a composite foreign judgment can be enforced in the UK when the judgment also includes an unenforceable multiple damages component.
Ratio Decidendi
A foreign judgment that includes both compensatory and multiple damages is unenforceable in the UK only to the extent of the multiple damages element under s.5 of the Protection of Trading Interests Act 1980. The compensatory elements, if severable and quantifiable, remain enforceable. The Act should not be construed to bar enforcement of the entire judgment where only part falls within the statutory prohibition.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed save as to the RICO multiple damages element; enforcement permitted for compensatory elements only.
Orders
- Judgment for claimant against each defendant in the sum of US $5,877,559 pursuant to CPR Part 24, together with interest to be assessed.
- RICO Act multiple damages element (US $1,188,246) not enforceable.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment