Demirel v Tasarruf Mevduati Sigorta Fonu [2007] EWCA Civ 799 (26 July 2007)
CPR 6.20(9) does not require assets within the jurisdiction for permission to serve out; court's discretion is sufficient safeguard; claimant must show reasonable prospect of benefit from proceedings; England is proper forum for enforcement action.
- Citation
- [2007] EWCA Civ 799
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Yahya Murat Demirel; Defendant/appellant: Tasarruf Mevduati Sigorta Fonu
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; permission to appeal granted; extension of time granted.
- Legal Topics
- Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, Service Out of Jurisdiction, Freezing Injunctions, Forum Conveniens
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Yahya Murat Demirel
Claimant/respondent
Tasarruf Mevduati Sigorta Fonu
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal (civil Division) Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether CPR 6.20(9) requires assets within the jurisdiction for permission to serve out
- 2 Whether permission to serve out should be refused as serving no useful purpose
- 3 Whether England is the proper forum for the claim
Ratio Decidendi
CPR 6.20(9) does not require assets within the jurisdiction for permission to serve out; court's discretion is sufficient safeguard; claimant must show reasonable prospect of benefit from proceedings; England is proper forum for enforcement action.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; permission to appeal granted; extension of time granted.
Orders
- Extension of time for appeal granted.
- Permission to appeal granted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment