Agbara & Ors v The Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Ltd & Ors [2019] EWHC 3340 (QB) (05 December 2019)
The registration of the Nigerian judgment was set aside because Shell suffered a serious breach of natural justice by being prevented from presenting its defence, making it not just and convenient to enforce the judgment in the UK under s. 9(1) AJA. There was no pending appeal within s. 9(2)(e) AJA, and the appellate process in Nigeria did not cure the breach.
- Citation
- [2019] EWHC 3340 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimants: Chief Isaac Osaro Agbara, Chief Victor Obari, Chief Humphery Ogiti, Chief F. N. Ogusu, Chief John N. Oguru, Hon. Joseph Ogosu, Chief G. O. Nnah, Chief George O. Osaro, Chief Adanta Obelle, Mrs Laleoka Ejii (for themselves and on behalf of the Ancient 'Onne Eh Ejama' Stool-in-Council, Chiefs, Elders, Men, Women and Children of Ejama-Ebubu in Tai Eleme Local Government Area of Rivers State); Defendants: The Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited, Shell International Petroleum Company Limited, Shell International Exploration and Production BV
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Set Aside Registration of Foreign Judgment / High Court (queen's Bench Division) Decision on Application
- Outcome
- Application allowed; registration of Nigerian judgment set aside.
- Legal Topics
- Enforcement of Foreign Judgments, Natural Justice, Registration of Foreign Judgments, Breach of Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Chief Isaac Osaro Agbara, Chief Victor Obari, Chief Humphery Ogiti, Chief F. N. Ogusu, Chief John N. Oguru, Hon. Joseph Ogosu, Chief G. O. Nnah, Chief George O. Osaro, Chief Adanta Obelle, Mrs Laleoka Ejii (for themselves and on behalf of the Ancient 'Onne Eh Ejama' Stool-in-Council, Chiefs, Elders, Men, Women and Children of Ejama-Ebubu in Tai Eleme Local Government Area of Rivers State)
Claimants
The Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Limited, Shell International Petroleum Company Limited, Shell International Exploration and Production BV
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Registration of Foreign Judgment / High Court (queen's Bench Division) Decision on Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether registration of Nigerian judgment should be set aside under s. 9 Administration of Justice Act 1920 due to pending appeal or breach of natural justice
- 2 Whether it is just and convenient to enforce the judgment in the UK
- 3 Whether the quantum of the registered judgment is excessive or includes unenforceable punitive damages
Ratio Decidendi
The registration of the Nigerian judgment was set aside because Shell suffered a serious breach of natural justice by being prevented from presenting its defence, making it not just and convenient to enforce the judgment in the UK under s. 9(1) AJA. There was no pending appeal within s. 9(2)(e) AJA, and the appellate process in Nigeria did not cure the breach.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; registration of Nigerian judgment set aside.
Orders
- Order of Master Eastman registering the judgment is set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment