Skatteforvaltningen (The Danish Customs And Tax Administration) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors
All of SKAT's claims, though framed in private law causes of action, are in substance attempts to enforce the Kingdom of Denmark's sovereign right to tax dividends under Danish law; the central interest is the vindication of Danish revenue law, not a patrimonial claim; Dicey Rule 3 applies and renders such claims inadmissible in the English court, regardless of the form of the claim or the use of private law labels; the Brussels-Lugano regime does not preclude the application of Dicey Rule 3, as it is a substantive rule of English law and not a rule of jurisdiction; all claims fall to be dismissed.
- Parties
- Claimant: SKATTEFORVALTNINGEN (the Danish Customs and Tax Administration); Defendants: Solo Capital Partners LLP (in administration) and others (including Sanjay Shah Defendants, DWF Defendants, Acupay System LLC, Messrs Knott & Hoogewerf, PS/GoC Defendants, Edo Barac Defendants, ED&F Man Capital Markets Ltd, Indigo Global Partners Ltd, HK Defendants, and others); Defendants: Other Defendants (various, some unrepresented or not appearing)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (commercial Court, Preliminary Issue Trial) / Judgment on Preliminary Issue (revenue Rule Trial)
- Outcome
- All of SKAT's claims dismissed as inadmissible under Dicey Rule 3 (the revenue rule).
- Legal Topics
- Enforcement of Foreign Revenue Laws, Dicey Rule 3, Jurisdiction, Tax Refund Fraud, Private Law Claims by Sovereigns, Brussels Lugano Regime, Public Law Vs Patrimonial Claims
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SKATTEFORVALTNINGEN (the Danish Customs and Tax Administration)
Claimant
Solo Capital Partners LLP (in administration) and others (including Sanjay Shah Defendants, DWF Defendants, Acupay System LLC, Messrs Knott & Hoogewerf, PS/GoC Defendants, Edo Barac Defendants, ED&F Man Capital Markets Ltd, Indigo Global Partners Ltd, HK Defendants, and others)
Defendants
Other Defendants (various, some unrepresented or not appearing)
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil (commercial Court, Preliminary Issue Trial) / Judgment on Preliminary Issue (revenue Rule Trial)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether SKAT's claims to recover tax refunds paid out by mistake (allegedly induced by fraud/negligence) are inadmissible in the English court under Dicey Rule 3 (the 'revenue rule')
- 2 Whether the claims are, in substance, attempts to enforce Danish revenue law or exercise sovereign authority extra-territorially
- 3 Whether the Brussels-Lugano regime precludes the application of Dicey Rule 3 to claims against defendants domiciled in member states
Ratio Decidendi
All of SKAT's claims, though framed in private law causes of action, are in substance attempts to enforce the Kingdom of Denmark's sovereign right to tax dividends under Danish law; the central interest is the vindication of Danish revenue law, not a patrimonial claim; Dicey Rule 3 applies and renders such claims inadmissible in the English court, regardless of the form of the claim or the use of private law labels; the Brussels-Lugano regime does not preclude the application of Dicey Rule 3, as it is a substantive rule of English law and not a rule of jurisdiction; all claims fall to be dismissed.
Court Disposition
All of SKAT's claims dismissed as inadmissible under Dicey Rule 3 (the revenue rule).
Orders
- All claims by SKAT are dismissed.
- No order as to the merits of the underlying allegations of fraud, negligence, or unjust enrichment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment