Khatoon v The Entry Clearance Officer Islamabad

Khatoon v The Entry Clearance Officer Islamabad

Neither the First-tier Tribunal nor the Upper Tribunal made a material error of law; the claimant was an adult at the date of decision, there was no obligation to consider her as a child, and no obvious or strong Article 8 claim was before the tribunals.

Parties
Claimant: Sarah Khatoon; First Defendant: The Entry Clearance Officer, Islamabad; Second Defendant: The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 April 2013
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Entry Clearance, Judicial Review, Article 8 ECHR, Immigration Rules, Appeals Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sarah Khatoon

Claimant

The Entry Clearance Officer, Islamabad

First Defendant

The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber)

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal erred in law by not treating the claimant as a child under 18 at the material time
  2. 2 Whether failure to consider Article 8 ECHR was a material error of law
  3. 3 Whether the tribunals were required to consider human rights issues not expressly raised

Ratio Decidendi

Neither the First-tier Tribunal nor the Upper Tribunal made a material error of law; the claimant was an adult at the date of decision, there was no obligation to consider her as a child, and no obvious or strong Article 8 claim was before the tribunals.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed