Khatoon v The Entry Clearance Officer Islamabad
Neither the First-tier Tribunal nor the Upper Tribunal made a material error of law; the claimant was an adult at the date of decision, there was no obligation to consider her as a child, and no obvious or strong Article 8 claim was before the tribunals.
- Parties
- Claimant: Sarah Khatoon; First Defendant: The Entry Clearance Officer, Islamabad; Second Defendant: The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Entry Clearance, Judicial Review, Article 8 ECHR, Immigration Rules, Appeals Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sarah Khatoon
Claimant
The Entry Clearance Officer, Islamabad
First Defendant
The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber)
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First-tier Tribunal and Upper Tribunal erred in law by not treating the claimant as a child under 18 at the material time
- 2 Whether failure to consider Article 8 ECHR was a material error of law
- 3 Whether the tribunals were required to consider human rights issues not expressly raised
Ratio Decidendi
Neither the First-tier Tribunal nor the Upper Tribunal made a material error of law; the claimant was an adult at the date of decision, there was no obligation to consider her as a child, and no obvious or strong Article 8 claim was before the tribunals.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment