Foxtons Ltd v Thesleff & Anor [2005] EWCA Civ 514 (19 April 2005)
The contract clearly provided that Foxtons' commission became payable upon exchange of unconditional contracts, not completion, and both the principal and agent were liable as per the explicit terms signed and acknowledged by the agent.
- Citation
- [2005] EWCA Civ 514
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Foxtons Limited; Defendant/respondent: Markus Thesleff; Defendant/respondent: Claire Thesleff
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Central London County Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; judgment for claimant
- Legal Topics
- Estate Agent Commission, Interpretation of Contract Terms, Agent Liability, Effect of Statutory Regulations on Contract Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Foxtons Limited
Claimant/appellant
Markus Thesleff
Defendant/respondent
Claire Thesleff
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Central London County Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Foxtons' commission became payable upon exchange of contracts or only upon completion of sale
- 2 Whether the agent (first defendant) was personally liable for the commission
- 3 Whether the contract terms were sufficiently brought to the defendants' attention
Ratio Decidendi
The contract clearly provided that Foxtons' commission became payable upon exchange of unconditional contracts, not completion, and both the principal and agent were liable as per the explicit terms signed and acknowledged by the agent.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; judgment for claimant
Orders
- Judgment for claimant for £30,315 inclusive of VAT plus interest to be agreed and given to court
- Appellant/claimant's costs of appeal and below to be agreed or determined by detailed assessment
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment