Hilali v Governor of HMP Whitemoor & Ors [2007] EWHC 939 (Admin) (25 April 2007)
Habeas corpus is available after completion of statutory extradition proceedings in exceptional circumstances where the factual basis for detention is fundamentally undermined. The exclusion of telephone intercept evidence and the acquittal of Yarkas mean the EAW no longer contains sufficient particulars of conduct to support an extradition offence under s.64 of the Extradition Act 2003. The continued detention of the applicant is therefore unlawful and a writ of habeas corpus must issue.
- Citation
- [2007] EWHC 939 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Farid Hilali; First Respondent: Governor of HMP Whitemoor; Second Respondent: Central Court of Committal Proceedings No 5, The High Court, Madrid; Intervener: Secretary of State for the Home Department
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus / Post Extradition Order, Post Statutory Appeal, Application for Habeas Corpus
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Writ of habeas corpus granted.
- Legal Topics
- European Arrest Warrant, Habeas Corpus, Extradition Act 2003, Article 5 ECHR, Mutual Recognition of Judicial Decisions, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Farid Hilali
Claimant
Governor of HMP Whitemoor
First Respondent
Central Court of Committal Proceedings No 5, The High Court, Madrid
Second Respondent
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus / Post Extradition Order, Post Statutory Appeal, Application for Habeas Corpus
Legal Issues
- 1 Is habeas corpus available after completion of statutory extradition proceedings under the Extradition Act 2003?
- 2 Has the factual basis for the extradition order been fundamentally undermined by subsequent events, rendering continued detention unlawful?
- 3 Does the exclusion of telephone intercept evidence and the acquittal of a co-defendant invalidate the extradition order?
Ratio Decidendi
Habeas corpus is available after completion of statutory extradition proceedings in exceptional circumstances where the factual basis for detention is fundamentally undermined. The exclusion of telephone intercept evidence and the acquittal of Yarkas mean the EAW no longer contains sufficient particulars of conduct to support an extradition offence under s.64 of the Extradition Act 2003. The continued detention of the applicant is therefore unlawful and a writ of habeas corpus must issue.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Writ of habeas corpus granted.
Orders
- Applicant to be released from detention pursuant to the extradition order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment