Nemeth v Hungarian Judicial Authorities [2022] EWHC 273 (Admin) (10 February 2022)
Permission to appeal was granted to the Requesting State on the money laundering charge against Csaba Nemeth as it was reasonably arguable that the particulars in EAW7 were sufficient under s.2(4)(c) of the Extradition Act 2003. Permission to appeal was refused to Maria Lakatos and Maria Horvath on Article 8 ECHR grounds as the public interest in extradition decisively outweighed the factors against extradition, including updated medical evidence and family circumstances. Adjournment for further medical evidence in Lakatos's case was refused as it would not affect the Article 8 outcome.
- Citation
- [2022] EWHC 273 (Admin)
- Parties
- Requested Person: Csaba Nemeth; Requested Person: Maria Lakatos; Requested Person: Maria Horvath; Requesting State: Hungarian Judicial Authorities
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 February 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Extradition/appeal / Applications for Permission to Appeal Against Extradition Orders and Discharge
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted to Requesting State on Nemeth money laundering charge; permission to appeal refused to Lakatos and Horvath on Article 8; adjournment refused.
- Legal Topics
- European Arrest Warrant, Article 8 ECHR, Particularisation Under Extradition Act 2003 S.2(4)(c), Mental Health in Extradition, Specialty Rights, Proportionality in Extradition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Csaba Nemeth
Requested Person
Maria Lakatos
Requested Person
Maria Horvath
Requested Person
Hungarian Judicial Authorities
Requesting State
Procedural Posture
Extradition/appeal / Applications for Permission to Appeal Against Extradition Orders and Discharge
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the particulars in EAW7 for money laundering against Csaba Nemeth satisfy s.2(4)(c) of the Extradition Act 2003
- 2 Whether extradition of Maria Lakatos and Maria Horvath is disproportionate under Article 8 ECHR due to health and family circumstances
- 3 Whether adjournment should be granted for further medical evidence in Maria Lakatos's case
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal was granted to the Requesting State on the money laundering charge against Csaba Nemeth as it was reasonably arguable that the particulars in EAW7 were sufficient under s.2(4)(c) of the Extradition Act 2003. Permission to appeal was refused to Maria Lakatos and Maria Horvath on Article 8 ECHR grounds as the public interest in extradition decisively outweighed the factors against extradition, including updated medical evidence and family circumstances. Adjournment for further medical evidence in Lakatos's case was refused as it would not affect the Article 8 outcome.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted to Requesting State on Nemeth money laundering charge; permission to appeal refused to Lakatos and Horvath on Article 8; adjournment refused.
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted to Requesting State on Nemeth money laundering charge (EAW7)
- Permission to appeal refused to Maria Lakatos on Article 8 ECHR
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment