Nemeth v Hungarian Judicial Authorities
Permission to appeal is granted on the Article 8 ECHR ground in relation to Marina Horvath as the threshold of reasonable arguability is met, particularly due to the unusual feature of extradition being justified in principle but deferred due to the welfare of a young child. Applications to stay section 12A and Article 8 ECHR grounds are refused as the court should resolve them without further delay. Applications for extension of representation orders for further reports and Queen's Counsel are refused as unjustified at this stage.
- Parties
- Requested Person: Csaba Nemeth; Requested Person: Maria Lakatos; Requested Person: Maria Horvath; Requested Person: Marina Horvath; Requesting State: Hungarian Judicial Authorities
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Extradition / Permission to Appeal and Interim Applications
- Outcome
- permission to appeal granted in part, applications for stays and representation order extensions refused, matters adjourned for reconvened hearing
- Legal Topics
- European Arrest Warrant, Article 8 ECHR, Article 3 ECHR, Article 5 ECHR, Article 6 ECHR, Section 12 a Extradition Act 2003, Representation Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Csaba Nemeth
Requested Person
Maria Lakatos
Requested Person
Maria Horvath
Requested Person
Marina Horvath
Requested Person
Hungarian Judicial Authorities
Requesting State
Procedural Posture
Extradition / Permission to Appeal and Interim Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to stay proceedings pending outcome of Bogdan case on section 2/Article 6 ECHR
- 2 Whether to stay other related matters pending Bogdan
- 3 Whether to stay section 12A and Article 8 ECHR grounds for efficiency
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is granted on the Article 8 ECHR ground in relation to Marina Horvath as the threshold of reasonable arguability is met, particularly due to the unusual feature of extradition being justified in principle but deferred due to the welfare of a young child. Applications to stay section 12A and Article 8 ECHR grounds are refused as the court should resolve them without further delay. Applications for extension of representation orders for further reports and Queen's Counsel are refused as unjustified at this stage.
Court Disposition
permission to appeal granted in part, applications for stays and representation order extensions refused, matters adjourned for reconvened hearing
Orders
- Stay granted on section 2/Article 6 ECHR issue pending outcome of Bogdan case
- Applications to stay four other matters to be heard at reconvened hearing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment