CA Blackwell (Contractors) Ltd. v Gerling Allegemeine Verischerungs Ag

CA Blackwell (Contractors) Ltd. v Gerling Allegemeine Verischerungs Ag

The exclusion clause does not apply because it was not established that the property insured (capping and sub-formation) was in a defective condition due to a relevant defect. Temporary drainage, even if considered property insured, is distinct from the damaged works. The insurer failed to prove the existence of a relevant defect triggering the exclusion.

Parties
Claimant/respondent: CA Blackwell (Contractors) Ltd; Defendant/appellant: Gerling Allegemeine Verischerungs - AG
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 November 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Exclusion Clauses, All Risks Insurance, Defective Workmanship, Policy Construction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CA Blackwell (Contractors) Ltd

Claimant/respondent

Gerling Allegemeine Verischerungs - AG

Defendant/appellant

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court

  1. 1 Whether the exclusion clause in the contractors all risks policy excluded the claim for damage to earthworks
  2. 2 Whether the property insured was in a defective condition due to a defect in design, materials, or workmanship

Ratio Decidendi

The exclusion clause does not apply because it was not established that the property insured (capping and sub-formation) was in a defective condition due to a relevant defect. Temporary drainage, even if considered property insured, is distinct from the damaged works. The insurer failed to prove the existence of a relevant defect triggering the exclusion.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; High Court judgment upheld