Barnsley & Ors v Noble [2015] EWCA Civ 875 (30 June 2015)
The claimants have an arguable case that the exoneration clause does not protect Philip if he did not act in good faith or committed wilful wrongdoing, and should be allowed to develop these arguments on appeal.
- Citation
- [2015] EWCA Civ 875
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: John Corbitt Barnsley; Claimant/appellant: Gillian Elizabeth Noble; Claimant/appellant: LGL Trustees Limited; Claimant/appellant: LGL Nominees Limited; Defendant/respondent: Philip Noble
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted
- Legal Topics
- Exoneration Clauses, Self Dealing, Breach of Trust, Fiduciary Duties, Interpretation of Wills
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Corbitt Barnsley
Claimant/appellant
Gillian Elizabeth Noble
Claimant/appellant
LGL Trustees Limited
Claimant/appellant
LGL Nominees Limited
Claimant/appellant
Philip Noble
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the exoneration clause in the will protects the trustee from liability for self-dealing absent good faith
- 2 Proper interpretation of 'wilful and individual fraud or wrongdoing' in the exoneration clause
- 3 Whether the trustee acted in good faith
Ratio Decidendi
The claimants have an arguable case that the exoneration clause does not protect Philip if he did not act in good faith or committed wilful wrongdoing, and should be allowed to develop these arguments on appeal.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted
Orders
- Claimants granted permission to appeal on grounds relating to the exoneration clause, good faith, and related issues.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment