Banca Generali S.p.A v CFE (Suisse) SA & Anor.
The applicants have demonstrated a good reason for expedition due to repeated inability to report on fair market value, potential regulatory and reputational consequences, and imminent maturity of Notes; no prejudice to defendants and minimal impact on court administration.
- Parties
- Claimant/applicant: Banca Generali S.p. A; Defendant/respondent: CFE (Suisse) SA; Defendant/respondent: Sovereign Credit Opportunities SA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Interim Application / Application for Expedited Hearing
- Outcome
- Application for expedited hearing granted
- Legal Topics
- Expedited Hearing, Disclosure of Information, Securitisation, Reporting Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Banca Generali S.p. A
Claimant/applicant
CFE (Suisse) SA
Defendant/respondent
Sovereign Credit Opportunities SA
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Interim Application / Application for Expedited Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to an expedited hearing for disclosure of information relevant to securitised transactions
- 2 Whether the claimant has a right to inspect underlying documents to fulfil reporting obligations
Ratio Decidendi
The applicants have demonstrated a good reason for expedition due to repeated inability to report on fair market value, potential regulatory and reputational consequences, and imminent maturity of Notes; no prejudice to defendants and minimal impact on court administration.
Court Disposition
Application for expedited hearing granted
Orders
- One-day hearing to be expedited, likely in the week of 23 May, subject to parties’ convenience
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment