The Rangers Football Club Plc v Collyer Bristow LLP & Anor [2012] EWHC 1427 (Ch) (24 April 2012)
Justification exists for an expedited trial of all claims together, but not to the extent or timetable sought by the joint administrators. The trial should be listed in October 2012 to allow proper preparation and avoid prejudice. No order for specific disclosure is appropriate at this stage due to the current procedural posture and uncertainty as to the issues and scope of disclosure.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 1427 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: The Rangers Football Club plc (In Administration); First Defendant: Collyer Bristow LLP; Second Defendant: The Rangers FC Group Limited; First Respondent: Merchant Turnaround plc; Second Respondent: The Trustees of the Jerome Group plc Pension Fund; Intervener: Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Expedition of Proceedings / Interlocutory Application for Expedited Trial and Directions
- Outcome
- Application for expedition granted in part; directions for expedited trial in October 2012; application for specific disclosure refused at this stage; costs summarily assessed against Group for conceded application.
- Legal Topics
- Expedited Trial, Unlawful Means Conspiracy, Breach of Trust, Breach of Undertaking, Negligence, Equitable Compensation, Proprietary Claims, Directions for Disclosure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Rangers Football Club plc (In Administration)
Claimant
Collyer Bristow LLP
First Defendant
The Rangers FC Group Limited
Second Defendant
Merchant Turnaround plc
First Respondent
The Trustees of the Jerome Group plc Pension Fund
Second Respondent
Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Application for Expedition of Proceedings / Interlocutory Application for Expedited Trial and Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claims concerning the Fund should be expedited and tried together
- 2 Whether the timetable proposed by the joint administrators is achievable and justified
- 3 Whether specific disclosure should be ordered at this stage
Ratio Decidendi
Justification exists for an expedited trial of all claims together, but not to the extent or timetable sought by the joint administrators. The trial should be listed in October 2012 to allow proper preparation and avoid prejudice. No order for specific disclosure is appropriate at this stage due to the current procedural posture and uncertainty as to the issues and scope of disclosure.
Court Disposition
Application for expedition granted in part; directions for expedited trial in October 2012; application for specific disclosure refused at this stage; costs summarily assessed against Group for conceded application.
Orders
- All claims to be tried together in an expedited trial window between 1 October and 31 October 2012.
- No order for specific disclosure at this stage.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment