The Rangers Football Club Plc v Collyer Bristow LLP & Anor
Justification exists for an expedited trial of all claims, but not to the extent or timetable sought by the joint administrators. All claims are inextricably linked and should be tried together for efficiency and good administration of justice. The proposed timetable is unachievable and prejudicial to Collyer Bristow. The trial should be listed for October 2012. No order for specific disclosure is appropriate at this stage; such applications may be made after defences are served. Costs for the delivery up application are summarily assessed at £11,000.
- Parties
- Claimant: The Rangers Football Club PLC (In Administration); First Defendant: Collyer Bristow LLP; Second Defendant: The Rangers FC Group Limited; First Respondent: Merchant Turnaround PLC; Second Respondent: The Trustees of the Jerome Group PLC Pension Fund; Other Party: Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (commercial/company) / Interlocutory Application for Expedition and Directions
- Outcome
- Application for expedition granted in part; all claims to be tried together in October 2012; application for specific disclosure refused at this stage; costs summarily assessed.
- Legal Topics
- Expedition of Trial, Proprietary Claims, Breach of Trust, Unlawful Means Conspiracy, Breach of Undertaking, Negligence, Directions for Disclosure, Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Rangers Football Club PLC (In Administration)
Claimant
Collyer Bristow LLP
First Defendant
The Rangers FC Group Limited
Second Defendant
Merchant Turnaround PLC
First Respondent
The Trustees of the Jerome Group PLC Pension Fund
Second Respondent
Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Other Party
Procedural Posture
Civil (commercial/company) / Interlocutory Application for Expedition and Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claims should be expedited and to what extent
- 2 Whether all claims should be tried together or separately
- 3 Whether specific disclosure should be ordered at this stage
Ratio Decidendi
Justification exists for an expedited trial of all claims, but not to the extent or timetable sought by the joint administrators. All claims are inextricably linked and should be tried together for efficiency and good administration of justice. The proposed timetable is unachievable and prejudicial to Collyer Bristow. The trial should be listed for October 2012. No order for specific disclosure is appropriate at this stage; such applications may be made after defences are served. Costs for the delivery up application are summarily assessed at £11,000.
Court Disposition
Application for expedition granted in part; all claims to be tried together in October 2012; application for specific disclosure refused at this stage; costs summarily assessed.
Orders
- Trial of all claims expedited to a window between 1 October and 31 October 2012.
- No order for specific disclosure at this stage; liberty to apply after service of defences.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment