Aird & Anor v Prime Meridian Ltd [2006] EWCA Civ 1866 (21 December 2006)
A joint statement of experts prepared pursuant to a court order under CPR 35.12(3) is not privileged and is admissible in the proceedings, even if it was used in mediation. The status of the document is determined by the court order and the rules, not by the parties' intentions or the context of mediation.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 1866
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Aird & Anr; Defendant/respondent: Prime Meridian Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 December 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (technology and Construction Court)
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Expert Evidence, Privilege, Mediation, Case Management Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aird & Anr
Claimant/appellant
Prime Meridian Limited
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From High Court (technology and Construction Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a joint statement of experts ordered under CPR 35.12(3) and used in mediation is privileged and inadmissible in subsequent proceedings
- 2 Whether the intention of the parties or the context of mediation alters the status of a court-ordered expert statement
Ratio Decidendi
A joint statement of experts prepared pursuant to a court order under CPR 35.12(3) is not privileged and is admissible in the proceedings, even if it was used in mediation. The status of the document is determined by the court order and the rules, not by the parties' intentions or the context of mediation.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment