Stallwood v David & Anor [2006] EWHC 2600 (QB) (25 October 2006)
Permission to rely on additional expert evidence should only be granted in rare cases where there is good reason to doubt the revised opinion of the original expert; in this case, special circumstances relating to the manner of the hearing and the claimant's sense of grievance justify granting permission.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 2600 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Mary Stallwood; Defendant/respondent: G. H. David; Defendant/respondent: M. Adamson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 October 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From County Court (personal Injury) / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Expert Evidence, Case Management, Loss of Earnings, Whiplash Injury
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mary Stallwood
Claimant/appellant
G. H. David
Defendant/respondent
M. Adamson
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From County Court (personal Injury) / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a party dissatisfied with their expert's opinion after expert discussion can obtain permission to rely on additional expert evidence
- 2 Appropriateness of granting permission for further expert evidence under CPR 35
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to rely on additional expert evidence should only be granted in rare cases where there is good reason to doubt the revised opinion of the original expert; in this case, special circumstances relating to the manner of the hearing and the claimant's sense of grievance justify granting permission.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Claimant granted permission to rely upon the expert evidence of Mr. Horan
- Counsel to agree terms of order giving effect to decision
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment