Glover & Anor v Fluid Structural Engineers & Technical Designers Ltd & Ors [2024] EWHC 1257 (TCC) (23 May 2024)
Permission is granted for the claimants to appoint a replacement structural engineering expert (Mr Tant) because structural engineering evidence is central, the trial date can be preserved, and the conduct complained of was that of the solicitors, not the claimants. Full and frank admission and apology by the solicitors mitigates the breach. Sufficient disclosure has been provided to protect AXA XL's interests. The overriding objective favours allowing the claimants to present their case with expert evidence, subject to costs and directions.
- Citation
- [2024] EWHC 1257 (TCC)
- Parties
- First Claimant: Jenni Glover; Second Claimant: Littleton Glover; First Defendant: Fluid Structural Engineers & Technical Designers Limited; Second Defendant: Chase Construction (Contracts) Limited; Third Defendant: Starstone Insurance SE; Fourth Defendant: Chubb London Aviation Limited; Fifth Defendant: Chubb European Group; Sixth Defendant: AXA XL Insurance Company Limited (formerly known as XL Catlin Insurance Company UK Limited)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 May 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Claim / Interlocutory Application Ruling
- Outcome
- Permission granted for claimants to appoint a replacement structural engineering expert; permission to rely on Mr Hardy's evidence revoked.
- Legal Topics
- Expert Evidence, Change of Expert, Disclosure, Professional Conduct, Case Management, Policy Exclusions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jenni Glover
First Claimant
Littleton Glover
Second Claimant
Fluid Structural Engineers & Technical Designers Limited
First Defendant
Chase Construction (Contracts) Limited
Second Defendant
Starstone Insurance SE
Third Defendant
Chubb London Aviation Limited
Fourth Defendant
Chubb European Group
Fifth Defendant
AXA XL Insurance Company Limited (formerly known as XL Catlin Insurance Company UK Limited)
Sixth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim / Interlocutory Application Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission should be granted for claimants to appoint a replacement structural engineering expert
- 2 Whether permission to rely on Mr Hardy's evidence should be revoked
- 3 What conditions should attach to permission for a replacement expert
Ratio Decidendi
Permission is granted for the claimants to appoint a replacement structural engineering expert (Mr Tant) because structural engineering evidence is central, the trial date can be preserved, and the conduct complained of was that of the solicitors, not the claimants. Full and frank admission and apology by the solicitors mitigates the breach. Sufficient disclosure has been provided to protect AXA XL's interests. The overriding objective favours allowing the claimants to present their case with expert evidence, subject to costs and directions.
Court Disposition
Permission granted for claimants to appoint a replacement structural engineering expert; permission to rely on Mr Hardy's evidence revoked.
Orders
- Claimants' permission to rely on Mr Hardy's evidence is revoked.
- Claimants granted permission to rely on structural engineering evidence from Mr Tant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment