First City Monument Bank Plc v Zumax Nigeria Ltd
The transfers from Redsear Account to IMB/FCMB's Commerzbank accounts were not subject to any trust (express or Quistclose). The instructions specifying 'for further credit to Zumax' did not manifest an intention to create a trust, nor were the funds segregated or restricted from IMB's free disposal. The banker-customer relationship remained one of debtor and creditor. FCMB should be allowed to defend the claim on the basis that it paid or accounted to Zumax for the disputed transfers.
- Parties
- Appellant (defendant): First City Monument Bank PLC; Respondent (claimant): Zumax Nigeria Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment in High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; summary judgment on trust claim set aside; FCMB permitted to defend payment for first, second, fourth to ninth transfers; appeal dismissed as to tenth transfer.
- Legal Topics
- Express Trusts, Quistclose Trusts, Banker Customer Relationship, Summary Judgment, Payment and Tracing, Fiduciary Duty
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
First City Monument Bank PLC
Appellant (defendant)
Zumax Nigeria Limited
Respondent (claimant)
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment in High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transfers from Redsear Account to Commerzbank accounts were held on trust for Zumax
- 2 Whether IMB/FCMB owed Zumax a fiduciary duty
- 3 Whether FCMB paid or accounted to Zumax for the disputed transfers
Ratio Decidendi
The transfers from Redsear Account to IMB/FCMB's Commerzbank accounts were not subject to any trust (express or Quistclose). The instructions specifying 'for further credit to Zumax' did not manifest an intention to create a trust, nor were the funds segregated or restricted from IMB's free disposal. The banker-customer relationship remained one of debtor and creditor. FCMB should be allowed to defend the claim on the basis that it paid or accounted to Zumax for the disputed transfers.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; summary judgment on trust claim set aside; FCMB permitted to defend payment for first, second, fourth to ninth transfers; appeal dismissed as to tenth transfer.
Orders
- Summary judgment in favour of Zumax set aside except for tenth transfer.
- FCMB permitted to defend claim on payment for first, second, fourth to ninth transfers.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment