First City Monument Bank Plc v Zumax Nigeria Ltd

First City Monument Bank Plc v Zumax Nigeria Ltd

The transfers from Redsear Account to IMB/FCMB's Commerzbank accounts were not subject to any trust (express or Quistclose). The instructions specifying 'for further credit to Zumax' did not manifest an intention to create a trust, nor were the funds segregated or restricted from IMB's free disposal. The banker-customer relationship remained one of debtor and creditor. FCMB should be allowed to defend the claim on the basis that it paid or accounted to Zumax for the disputed transfers.

Parties
Appellant (defendant): First City Monument Bank PLC; Respondent (claimant): Zumax Nigeria Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
01 March 2019
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment in High Court
Outcome
Appeal allowed in part; summary judgment on trust claim set aside; FCMB permitted to defend payment for first, second, fourth to ninth transfers; appeal dismissed as to tenth transfer.
Legal Topics
Express Trusts, Quistclose Trusts, Banker Customer Relationship, Summary Judgment, Payment and Tracing, Fiduciary Duty

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 20 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

First City Monument Bank PLC

Appellant (defendant)

Zumax Nigeria Limited

Respondent (claimant)

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Summary Judgment in High Court

  1. 1 Whether the transfers from Redsear Account to Commerzbank accounts were held on trust for Zumax
  2. 2 Whether IMB/FCMB owed Zumax a fiduciary duty
  3. 3 Whether FCMB paid or accounted to Zumax for the disputed transfers

Ratio Decidendi

The transfers from Redsear Account to IMB/FCMB's Commerzbank accounts were not subject to any trust (express or Quistclose). The instructions specifying 'for further credit to Zumax' did not manifest an intention to create a trust, nor were the funds segregated or restricted from IMB's free disposal. The banker-customer relationship remained one of debtor and creditor. FCMB should be allowed to defend the claim on the basis that it paid or accounted to Zumax for the disputed transfers.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed in part; summary judgment on trust claim set aside; FCMB permitted to defend payment for first, second, fourth to ninth transfers; appeal dismissed as to tenth transfer.

Orders

  • Summary judgment in favour of Zumax set aside except for tenth transfer.
  • FCMB permitted to defend claim on payment for first, second, fourth to ninth transfers.