Richardson v Google UK Ltd & Anor
The claimant has persistently issued claims and applications which are totally without merit, re-litigated decided issues, and harassed parties and court staff. The evidence justifies the making of an extended civil restraint order for the maximum period of two years.
- Parties
- Claimant: Camille Saskia Richardson; First Defendant: Google UK Limited; Second Defendant: Facebook UK Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Extended Civil Restraint Order
- Outcome
- Extended Civil Restraint Order granted for two years against the claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Extended Civil Restraint Order, Vexatious Litigation, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Camille Saskia Richardson
Claimant
Google UK Limited
First Defendant
Facebook UK Limited
Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Extended Civil Restraint Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant has persistently issued claims or made applications which are totally without merit
- 2 Whether an extended civil restraint order (ECRO) should be granted against the claimant
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant has persistently issued claims and applications which are totally without merit, re-litigated decided issues, and harassed parties and court staff. The evidence justifies the making of an extended civil restraint order for the maximum period of two years.
Court Disposition
Extended Civil Restraint Order granted for two years against the claimant.
Orders
- The claimant is restrained from issuing claims or making applications in the High Court or County Court relating to these proceedings without permission of a judge for two years.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment