Floyd & Anor v Legal Services Commission [2010] EWHC 906 (QB) (28 April 2010)
The Civil Procedure Rules and Practice Direction do not override or amend the mandatory requirements of regulation 5 of the Community Legal Service (Cost Protection) Regulations 2000; the court has no discretion to extend time or grant relief from sanction unless good reason for delay is shown; no good reason was advanced; the costs judge was correct in law.
- Citation
- [2010] EWHC 906
- Parties
- Appellant in Costs Appeal; Claimant in Original Proceedings: Jacqueline Floyd; Defendant in Original Proceedings: S; Respondent in Costs Appeal: Legal Services Commission
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Costs Appeal / Appeal From Costs Judge's Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Relief From Sanction, Costs Orders Against Legal Services Commission, Community Legal Service (cost Protection) Regulations 2000, Civil Procedure Rules Applicability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jacqueline Floyd
Appellant in Costs Appeal; Claimant in Original Proceedings
S
Defendant in Original Proceedings
Legal Services Commission
Respondent in Costs Appeal
Procedural Posture
Costs Appeal / Appeal From Costs Judge's Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Civil Procedure Rules permit extension of time for late costs applications against the Legal Services Commission
- 2 Whether the Costs Judge erred in law by not exercising discretion to extend time or grant relief from sanction
- 3 Interpretation of regulation 5 of the Community Legal Service (Cost Protection) Regulations 2000
Ratio Decidendi
The Civil Procedure Rules and Practice Direction do not override or amend the mandatory requirements of regulation 5 of the Community Legal Service (Cost Protection) Regulations 2000; the court has no discretion to extend time or grant relief from sanction unless good reason for delay is shown; no good reason was advanced; the costs judge was correct in law.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Written submissions as to costs of the appeal to be filed within 14 days from the date of the sealed order; parties may request oral submissions if desired.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment