Município de Mariana & Ors v BHP Group (UK) Ltd & Anor
The court granted the extensions of time for service of APOCs, the revised claim form with addresses, and the updated master schedule, finding the claimants faced exceptional logistical challenges due to the unforeseen increase in claimants and had made significant efforts to comply. The extensions would not disrupt the trial timetable or cause disproportionate prejudice to the defendants. However, the extension for providing addresses was made an unless order due to prior indulgence. The court emphasised that further extensions may be refused and late claims may be stayed or dealt with separately.
- Parties
- Claimants: Município de Mariana & Others; Defendants: BHP Group (UK) Ltd and BHP Group Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application for Extension of Time / Interlocutory Application Ruling
- Outcome
- Applications for extension of time granted with conditions
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Case Management, Service of Pleadings, Access to Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Município de Mariana & Others
Claimants
BHP Group (UK) Ltd and BHP Group Limited
Defendants
Procedural Posture
Civil Application for Extension of Time / Interlocutory Application Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to grant extensions of time for service of additional particulars of claim (APOCs), revised claim form with addresses, and updated master schedule
- 2 Whether to permit service of APOCs via FileZilla
- 3 Whether to dispense with individual addresses for indigenous and Quilombola claimants
Ratio Decidendi
The court granted the extensions of time for service of APOCs, the revised claim form with addresses, and the updated master schedule, finding the claimants faced exceptional logistical challenges due to the unforeseen increase in claimants and had made significant efforts to comply. The extensions would not disrupt the trial timetable or cause disproportionate prejudice to the defendants. However, the extension for providing addresses was made an unless order due to prior indulgence. The court emphasised that further extensions may be refused and late claims may be stayed or dealt with separately.
Court Disposition
Applications for extension of time granted with conditions
Orders
- Extension of time for service of APOCs to 8 September 2023 granted (not a final or unless order, but further extensions may be refused)
- Extension of time for service of revised claim form with addresses to 8 September 2023 granted (unless order: claimants without addresses to be removed if not complied)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment