Bali v 1-2 Couriers Limited & Anor
The date of issue of the claim form is the date it is sealed and stamped by the court, not the date it is sent out; the solicitors did not take all reasonable steps to effect service within the prescribed period, and the judge was right to refuse an extension of time.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Mrs Bali; Respondent/defendant: 1-2 Couriers Limited; Respondent/defendant: Walsingham Motor Insurance Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order Refusing Extension of Time for Service and Striking Out Claim
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time for Service, Issue of Claim Form, Relief From Sanctions, Limitation Period
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Bali
Claimant/appellant
1-2 Couriers Limited
Respondent/defendant
Walsingham Motor Insurance Ltd
Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Order Refusing Extension of Time for Service and Striking Out Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the date of issue of a claim form for purposes of CPR rules 7.2 and 7.5?
- 2 Should an extension of time for service of the claim form be granted under CPR 7.6(3)?
Ratio Decidendi
The date of issue of the claim form is the date it is sealed and stamped by the court, not the date it is sent out; the solicitors did not take all reasonable steps to effect service within the prescribed period, and the judge was right to refuse an extension of time.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No extension of time for service granted
- Claim remains struck out
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment