Equipe Regeneration Ltd v Higgins Construction Ltd & Ors [2020] EWHC 3293 (TCC) (03 December 2020)
The extension of time for service of the Particulars of Claim was granted due to the extensive and reasonable need for further investigation and the agreement of the third defendant, subject to conditions regarding the Pre-Action Protocol letter and application deadlines. Disclosure was refused because the requirements for disclosure under the contract and CPR 31.12 were not met, the documents were not shown to be necessary at this stage, and some either did not exist or had already been provided.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 3293 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Equipe Regeneration Limited; First Defendant: Higgins Construction Limited; Second Defendant: Higgins Group PLC; Third Defendant: Mott MacDonald Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 December 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Applications (extension of Time and Disclosure)
- Outcome
- Extension of time granted; disclosure refused; costs in the case.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time for Service of Particulars of Claim, Disclosure of Documents, Pre Action Protocol, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Equipe Regeneration Limited
Claimant
Higgins Construction Limited
First Defendant
Higgins Group PLC
Second Defendant
Mott MacDonald Limited
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Applications (extension of Time and Disclosure)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant should be granted an extension of time for service of the Particulars of Claim
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to disclosure of certain categories of documents from the first and second defendants
Ratio Decidendi
The extension of time for service of the Particulars of Claim was granted due to the extensive and reasonable need for further investigation and the agreement of the third defendant, subject to conditions regarding the Pre-Action Protocol letter and application deadlines. Disclosure was refused because the requirements for disclosure under the contract and CPR 31.12 were not met, the documents were not shown to be necessary at this stage, and some either did not exist or had already been provided.
Court Disposition
Extension of time granted; disclosure refused; costs in the case.
Orders
- Extension of time for service of the Particulars of Claim to 11 March 2021, subject to best endeavours to serve the Pre-Action Protocol letter by 8 January 2021.
- Liberty to apply for further extension not later than 14 days before 11 March 2021, reserved to the same judge.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment